Does sex addiction exist

0 votes, average: 0 out of 50 votes, average: 0 out of 50 votes, average: 0 out of 50 votes, average: 0 out of 50 votes, average: 0 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

I found this the other day.

“Lord Laidlaw of Rothiemay has admitted to receiving treatment for “sex addiction” at a private clinic, likening it to alcohol dependency. But is it really?

It’s a term that first came to widespread attention when actor Michael Douglas was admitted to rehab in 1990 and it was reported, inaccurately he later claimed, that he was a sex addict.

More recently, comedian Russell Brand admitted to spending a week at a centre for sexual addiction in Philadelphia.”

But are so called sex addicts really suffering from an illness or just making excuses for being excessively promiscuous?

“It’s a very serious addiction, says Paula Hall, who runs a group therapy course for “sex addicts” in Warwickshire, and it’s believed about one in 20 people suffer from it.

Although not a chemical addiction like alcohol or heroin, it’s a “process addiction” like gambling, she says, with a biochemical element linked to the release of dopamine in the brain.

It’s a compulsive need to seek out and follow a certain type of sexual behavior. That behavior varies but it’s basically an anaesthetizing behavior, something you are doing in order to avoid dealing with something else.

It’s a coping mechanism and it’s totally and entirely out of control. You are continuing to pursue it in spite of the consequences, like losing your job, your status, your wife and your health.”

The term Sexual addiction is used to describe the behavior of a person who is obsessed with sex and who repeatedly and compulsively seeks sexual contact through impersonal and non-intimate behavior such as swinging or dogging or who compulsively engages in sexual acts such as masturbation and voyeurism. Opinion is divided on whether Sexual addiction is a valid mental illness in itself or is a symptom of other mental disorders such as Obsessive compulsive disorder, Narcissistic personality disorder, or Manic-depression, as traits of addiction can be confused with these disorders, The DSM IV does not include diagnostic criteria for sexual addiction while the ICD 10 is currently working on criteria for this disorder.

There are three main theories which while not mutually incompatible view sexual addition in very different ways.

1) Sexual addiction as an addiction. Being addicted to sex is like being addicted to gambling or other risk taking behaviors but unlike substance addiction is an addiction to a behavior rather than to a substance. Schneider (1994) identified three indicators of addictive behavior.

• Compulsivity: An addict loses the ability to choose freely whether to stop or continue a particular sexual behavior

• Continuation: Addicts pursue their addiction despite the negative effects on their personal and professional lives

• Obsession: Addicts report spending whole days consumed by sexual thoughts developing elaborate fantasies and planning elaborate new ways of obtaining sexual gratification.

2) Orgasm releases large amounts of brain chemicals most notably Dopamine which is why, in contrast to the process view of addictive behavior, sex addiction is sometimes viewed as a chemical addiction. Some reports indicate that dopamine is a hundred times more addictive than heroin and works in a similar manner to cocaine or amphetamines. Nuerolepeptic medication might be one way of blocking the euphoric effect of dopamine acting on the higher decision making areas of the brain via the mesolimbic pathway and there by breaking the addictive cycle, but the low mood and poor self esteem that very often drives addictive behaviour in the first place can often successfully be treated with SSRI antidepressants.

3) The psychodynamic perspective can also be very effective when explaining sexual addiction. Psychodynamics places significant importance on early childhood development and experiences. The way a child is treated by his or her parents and peers has a great impact on their later life. Maltreatment occurring during childhood can scar the individual and lead to obsessional behavior of a sexual nature later in life.

The majority of people who admit to having a sexual addiction are probably male but the secretive nature of the problem means that it is probably under reported in both men and women and while a history of childhood neglect and abuse may contribute to sexual addiction later in life those guilty of committing sexual crimes such a rape or indecent assault may not be suffering from any form of mental illness at all.

Jennifer P. Schneider, (1994), Sex addiction: Controversy within Mainstream Addiction Medicine, Diagnosis Based on the DSM-III-R, and Physician Case Histories, Sexual Addiction and compulsivity, Volume 1, Issue 1, pages 19 - 44

Tags: , ,

7 comments

I’m suspicious of this one - an “illness”???? I believe the term was invented by Stanton Peele, who’s done loads of work on alcohol addiction, and who laments the creation of what he calls the “addiction industry” while simultaneously offering to “cure” alcoholics at tens of thousands of dollars a pop. This translates to me as “don’t buy their products, buy mine instead”. Even though I have little respect for the man, he’s on record as saying that he regrets coining the term “sex addiciton”.

And as for Russell Brand, he’s so self-obsessed he probably masturbates while watching videos of himself masturbating.

Current score: 0

Thanks for raising this, E. Sex as an addiction, and thus an illness, eh? I could confine my thoughts to, “What utter tosh!” but I’ll try and be more helpful 8)

People can make poor choices, a capacitated adult can choose “negative life events” including up to and suicide all in the absence of any mental illness what so ever. To think that wanting to do a lot of something pleasurable is beyond a psychological problem and in to formal psychiatric illness seems perverse.

It fails the definition (using psychopathological or ICD-10 categorical diagnosis) of a compulsion, so it’s not within the obsessive/compulsive spectrum. That’s theory one out.

Theory 3 is about relationships and electing to behave in a certain way through past experiences. So it’s still about elective choices, even if negative ones, not about psychosis or impaired capacity or compulsions. If that’s the case, then “sex addiction” as a concept is identical to “football addiction” and hordes of pubs shouls smash their plasma screens, all football stadia can be turned in to play parks, overpaid grown men (who should know better and leave playground games alone now) can stop cavorting about in the grass playing their ball games every week and get proper jobs ;)

Trite, I know, but my point is that saying you’re habituated to certain behaviours and accepted norms from past experiences gives an explanation and context but not a justification or nosological diagnosis for something. As such, theory 3 is an interpretation at best, it’s not a discrete diagnostic entity and doesn’t advance arguments that “sex addiction” can exist. That’s that theory shot, then.

That leaves theory 2. A curious one, this. You like doing something pleasurable, so do it a lot, getting pleasure from it, so do it lots, so this is an illness. Doesn’t quite follow for me, that one. But if it is an endocrine chemical disorder (and not psychological/mental illness) then the poor wee souls need their chemistry sorting out. As it’s a proper organic disorder, not a disturbance of mind, they need to have cyproterone acetate to chemically castrate them and effect a cure, or castration surgery, as those are the only 2 treatments we have.

How so ever you look at it, I really, really can’t see how this falls within mental health and illness!

Current score: 0

Thanks Shrink, that was a very comprehensive way of saying, “There’s no such thing as sex addiction, only dirty buggers who need to learn to keep it in their pants.”

Such as, e.g. Michael Douglas or Russell Brand.

Current score: 0

Compare Stan Collymore’s explanation of why he went “dogging,” in the second of two Radio Nottingham interviews in 2004, and Gene Simmond’s rather revolting description of his sexual exploits to Pamela Connolly in Shrink Rap.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingha.....ture.shtml

http://www.channel4.com/video/.....r_p_1.html

Current score: 0

When does “liking a lot of legover” become “sex addiction”, and who decides that?

We (by which I mean “society”) seem to be intent on creating a whole set of “dependencies” that never once existed in order to excuse/pathologise people’s bad/irresponsible behaviour and thereby deny them the very self-determination they might find actually helps them override their behaviour.

Current score: 0

I think there’s a massive difference between compulsive behaviour and actual illness. And, as beakie says, in a society seemingly obsessed with creating syndromes and other such classification to define people’s behaviour, it’s far too easy for people to say ‘I’m a sex addict’ and feel better.

Current score: 0