Recent Comments

Polls

Stop...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Forum Posts

Support

Blog Follow Thing

Preliminary Draft of the DSM-V

Preliminary Draft of the DSM-V Committee on Cyber Disorders

The Cyber Disorders section includes disorders that have a dependency upon cyber existence as the predominant feature. The section is divided into three parts. The first part describes e-mail episodes that serve as the building blocks for the disorder diagnoses. The second part describes the Cyber Disorders themselves. The criteria sets for most of the Cyber Disorders require the presence or absence of the e-mail episodes described in the first part of the section. The third part includes the specifiers that describe either the most recent e-mail episode, or the course of recurrent episodes.

The Cyber Disorders are divided into Posting Disorders, Flaming Disorders and CC Disorders. The Posting Disorders (i.e. Lurking Disorder, Chronic Posting Disorder and Posting Disorder not Otherwise Specified) are distinguished from the Flaming Disorders by the fact that there is no history of ever having posted a Flame, or Flame-with-Apology. CC Disorders (CC-All Disorder and Spam Disorder) may include episodes of Chronic Posting, Flames, and/or Flame-With-Apologies but can be distinguished by the number of addressees.

Lurking Disorder is characterized by one or more episodes of lurking (i.e. at least two weeks of lurking or loss of interest in answering mail accompanied by at least four additional symptoms of Lurking including high on-line time balances, walking away from the computer while logged on, composing posts and deleting them without sending them, etc.)

Chronic Posting Disorder is characterized by at least 4 weeks of posting to a newsgroup or listserv more days than not, accompanied by additional Cyber symptoms such as checking mail several times per day, posts in which the content is shorter than the message header or sig, and messages of extreme anxiety when list volume drops.

Posting Disorder not Otherwise Specified is included for coding disorders with posting features that do not meet the criteria for Lurking Disorder or Chronic Posting Disorder.

Flaming Disorder is characterized by one or more episodes of hot-tempered posts, usually posted within seconds of receiving the ‘trigger’ message, but can be distinguished from the Flame-With-Apology in that the sender has a sincere belief that he/she is 100% correct and morally entitled to his/her feelings of outrage. Flaming Disorder is often accompanied by Chronic Posting Disorder.

Flame-With-Apology Disorder is a milder form of the Flaming Disorder, in which the poster sincerely apologizes for the first portion of the message and yet sends it anyway. A variation of Flame-With-Apology exists in which posters staunchly defend their position for 3 to 4 days, then abruptly back down and revert to Chronic Posting or Lurking.

The specifiers described in the third part of the section are provided to increase diagnostic specificity, create more homogeneous subgroups, assist in treatment selection, and improve the prediction of prognosis. Some of the specifiers describe the current or most recent episode (i.e. Pine, Elm, Anonymous, With Humorous Features, and With Uncomplicated Internet Access).

From Mental Health Humour

Top ten signs you are approaching burn-out,
For mental health workers.

by Storm A. King
August 1996

10) You think of the peaceful park you like as “your private therapeutic milieu.”

9) You realize that your floridly psychotic patient, who is picking invisible flowers out of mid air, is probably having more fun in life than you are.

8.) A grateful client, who thinks you walk on water, brings you a small gift and you end up having to debrief your feelings of unworthiness with a colleague.

7) You are watching a re-run of the “Wizard of Oz” and you start to categorize the types of delusions that Dorothy had.

6) Your best friend comes to you with severe relationship troubles, and you start trying to remember which cognitive behavioral technique has the most empirical validly for treating this problem.

5) You realize you actually have no friends, they have all become just one big case load.

4) A co-worker asks how you are doing and you reply that you are a bit “internally preoccupied” and “not able to interact with peers” today.

3) Your spouse asks you to set the table and you tell them that it would be “countertherapeutic to your current goals” to do that.

2) You tell your teenage daughter she is not going to start dating boys because she is “in denial”, ”lacks insight.” and her “emotions are not congruent with her chronological age.”

And, the number one reason you may be burning out….

1) You are packing for a trip to a large family holiday reunion and you take the DSM-IV with you “just in case.”


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

8 comments to Preliminary Draft of the DSM-V

  • Many a true word spoken in jest… …

    Current score: 0
  • quite….

    Current score: 0
  • dazedandconfused

    Brilliant find Bloo.

    Current score: 0
  • This confirms what I knew all along, I`m nowhere near approaching burnout, I`m still fresh as a daisy.

    As for lampooning what will be in the new DSM, I suspect the author will get bitten on the arse.

    Current score: 0
  • nasogastric

    lurks

    Current score: 0
  • Mandy Lifeboats Adrift

    I don’t know about the web places people have written of but my view is that it is about choice.

    People don’t have to go to any web places if they don’t want to.

    Granted there is loads of crap out there in cyberland, but there is loads of crap in the real world as well. People, mostly, will find out for themselves what they want and is beneficial and if they want what I view as crap that is their choice too. My crap is someone else’s happy place.

    I have learnt, for myself, to take some sites and places more seriously than others. One big lesson I have also learnt is that ‘user friendly’ forums are often nothing like user friendly and can become arenas for people to fight with each other. Again, if that is what people want to do is their choice.

    Is there a place for the web in decision making process/policy development? Yes, but like anything else it can be the cherry picked ‘yes people’ who are used.

    I think some pro-activity from the decision making organisations in looking at what is going on in webland/blogland would be good.

    It could also be used by charities to gauge opinions. If they worked harder to use it.

    And I think blogland brings people together. Those with shared interests. I think that is a good thing.

    But I wouldn’t use it to have a second virtual life (with condo, rock star partner etc), not that I have a particularly quality riddled real life. I do need to be clear about what is real and what is pretendy so wouldn’t be going for a SIMS like fantasy land, I could lose myself in. Dangerous stuff.

    Current score: 0
  • Mandy Lifeboats Adrift

    P.S. Apologies for commenting on wrong article…sure people know which article I meant to respond to.

    Current score: 0