Loading ...
Update: and especially for dear old OSB: -
Update: and especially for dear old OSB: -
|
|||||
 |
More BNP LOLzUpdate: and especially for dear old OSB: - 27 comments to More BNP LOLz |
||||
|
Copyright © 2010 Mental Nurse - All Rights Reserved 205 queries. 4.635 seconds. |
|||||
very good.
Oh so now you’re suggesting that SANTA be prevented from delivering presents to BNP members are you, you evil leftie yoghurt-knitting teacher bastard?!
[ / oldschoolbaby mode ]
Oooh, this could be a good game. Can I play?
Yet more sick, socialist propaganda (the clue is in the fact that Santa is wearing a RED costume), handing out goodies to kids like some trendy lefty social worker giving out free benefits to the Great Unhosed. Santa? Stalin more like. He’s even got RED baubles, plus the pair of spectacles as a metaphor for how the Big Brother state will be watching us at all times, coming down our chimneys, knowing whether we’ve been naughty or nice. You people make me so sick I just projectile vomited all over my postman. I shall now post 3814 comments going on at length about how I’m being censored.
The BNP exists because of LEFTIES! YEs, anti-racist campaigners actually MAKE PEOPLE RACIST! If we didn’t have all these ridiculous laws against discrimination, incitement to race hatred and racial harassment, the UK would be A HAVEN OF PEACE AND TRANQUILITY. That Santa fails to see this is more evidence, were it needed, of the CANCER OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS that INFECTS this FINE LAND.
Enjoy pictures of Santa while you can, guys – he’s next after the PC brigade have finished with the BNP.
Did you know some stores now prevent children from sitting on Santas lap [now why is that I wonder ?].
The Royal Mail has removed christian references from its xmas stamps.
The Red Cross banned christmas deccies in their shops for fear of offending other religions.
And in 1998 Birmingham council called its festive celebrations “winterval”.
Altogether now:
Baa baa RAINBOW sheep……………..
More urban myths
Winterval – the truth
http://pigsonthewing.wordpress.....the-truth/
The Red Cross and Xmas decs
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2596703.stm
Royal Mail and Christmas stamps
http://www.indcatholicnews.com/roymai325.html
Oh yes you did…….oh, no we didn’t
But no, they didn’t.
I know these lies and distortions serve your purpose well, charge nurse (i.e. wibbling about the awfulness of the “PC Brigade” etc) but they still remain lies and distortions no matter how sincerely you wish they weren’t.
Re-read the Climbe report, Beakie.
Carole Baptiste & Co do not come out of it well.
Numerous commentators soon picked up on climate of political correctness that hampered standards of child protection in Haringey.
Fears [real or imagined] of racism may well have contributed to the way professionals performed in this case.
It was alleged that Baptiste spent a great deal of her time talking about her experiences as a black women, rather than providing adequate supervision to juniors like Lisa Arthurworry.
The office was said to be divided over a dispute about “obeah”a type of West Indian witchcraft.
Her white manager, Mary Richardson was afraid of rocking the boat due to cultural sensitivities.
I’m not saying that the final outcome would have been automatically different but as I say concerns about PC were almost certainly a significant factor.
No doubt it is all just another urban myth to you, though ?
The essential difference between the Climbie report and the lies and distortions you quote upthread is one of veracity.
So Frank Chalk, Inspector Gadget et al, are liars as well – there seem to be more and more of us about, Beakie ?
So Frank Chalk, Inspector Gadget et al, are liars as well
Did they repeat the nonsense about Birmingham renaming Christmas, or the Red Cross banning decorations so as not to offend Muslims, or the Royal Mail phasing out religious Christmas stamps?
You’re getting all confused again. Describing these lies and distortions as lies and distortions does not mean that I dispute the findings of the Climbie report or disagree with the opinions of other bloggers who chart the interference of central government in their respective professions.
You call it “interference of central government” – I call it political correctness, funnily enough so do Gadget and Chalk.
Whatever. As I said, calling lies and distortions lies and distortions does not imply anything else other than that they are lies and distortions.
Dear oh Dear – A&E Charge Nurse (AECN in future as am a lazy typist), you need to clean up your act when it comes to debate.
You’ve chimed in heavily on both the BNP posts and in both cases demonstrate a complete inability to argue a point on the facts.
Your main technique seems to be thus:
AECN: The sky isn’t blue, it is in fact purple!
Someone else (Z, Beakie): Actually I just had a look and it is indeed blue, unless you live in the UK, in which case it’s an unremitting grey.
AECN: But… but…. the sky isn’t green at all! And calling the sky green is insulting to DeeDee because she’s Irish, she’ll have a huge meltdown and scream at me and it’s all your fault!!!
Z, Beakie: I said the sky was blue. And here are a load of citations and sources to back it up, plus a link to the Met Offie’s website.
AECN: All the irish people in the UK are going to beat a path to my doorstep to protest and it’s all your fault and I won’t be able to get to work on time and I’ll get a bollocking from my boss! Or someone will die because I couldn’t get on duty on time – how does that make you feel?
This is known as Straw Man arguing (arguing vociferously against a point your opponent has not made at all). There are numerous other rhetorical devices available for those who wish to use them. For example, if you want people to agree with something a bit contentious and are making a speech in public, start by asking rhetorical questions, with the first 2 being blindingly obvious and the third what you want agreement on, trust me, it works, I have used it. (eg Do we want safer streets? Yes! Do we want litter collected daily? Yes! Do we want my uncle’s sanitation company to get the contract to clean the city, because he’ll get the job done? Yes!).
The likes of David Cameron and Gordon Brown are very familiar with such devices, useful to get someone to agree with you or win an argument by means other than exposition of the facts. They make good use of them and are skilled in their employ – the general public is uninterested in intelligent discussion, regardless of what they might say – both Cameron and Brown are more than capable of the latter if it suited them. But if you tried to use these tricks while actually trying to convince them of something, they’d laugh in your face – they can spot it a mile off, as can Paxman.
So, either you are doing this on purpose, which seems strange, as what can you possibly gain from this, other than knowing that you put your study of public speaking technique to use on the internet, and have superior rhetorical skills? Unless you actually don’t realise that you are making no logical sense whatsoever, in which case I suggest educating yourself (and before you accuse me of being a snob, your local library has everything you need, and this stuff tends not to actually be taught in universities. I just had a side interest in the whole area) so as to appear less bent on ‘winnning’ at all costs.
If you’re right, then a straightforward exposition of the facts, backed up with sources and cites, argued in a reasoned manner is all you need. If not, well, shouting isn’t going to help, or make you right, is it? Your current approach does nothing for you other than make you look like you’re desperate to score points off someone.
(For the record, I’m not just annoyed when the right does this. E does it too and it’s bloody annoying).
Or, you wish to vent your aggression on those of us who read this, in which case, can you kindly cease and desist? You don’t like it when drunk patients shout at you after all.
Anyways, going back to the LOLZ.
Dee Dee – I consider most of my observations to be quite modest, and unlike yours (above), rather more easily understood.
You, on the other hand, have reverted to one of the internets oldest cliche, the ubiquitous straw man put down.
Strawman accusations share certain similarities with accusations of being racist – the recipient usually ends up either digging themselves into a deeper hole (trying desperately to explain their original intent), otherwise they must dredge up all of their utterances once again to test their veracity against the strawman claim.
My comments are out there (to be read or ignored as others see fit) and since we are all over 21 surely it is up to each member of the MH community to draw their own conclusions ?
My views are my own and are sincerely held [in the main] even if I do go off the rails from time to time [possibly after being egged on the prince of darkness himself, aka, beaky].
You then further muddy the waters by attributing intent on my part to win “at all costs” – before slipping in a rather sly comment about venting “aggression”, a behaviour analogous to drunks shouting at staff in A&E, according to your analysis [my god this seems to be turning into a therapy session].
Well I’ve had one or two “drunks” in my face in A&E and I can assure you Dee Dee that the experience is rather more “aggressive” than a frank, and generally good natured exchange of opinions on an internet forum like this one.
I have no idea if OSB, or E (also criticised by you recently) have an audience in mind when they write their stuff – but I generally try to write openly and spontaneously while accepting that there may be divergent, or indeed diametrically opposed views in the MH forum.
One final point, I’m not trying to be “right” as you put it, I doubt if anyone has has ever read a comment of mine and then changed a deeply held conviction.
Various commentators are more like ciphers for the wider community in my opinion – and I’m sure you will have noticed that not everybody subscribes to the politically correct mindset.
I have tried to stick to the text as you have presented it Dee Dee [verbatim in most instances] I even managed to do it without visiting a library, thanks for the tip though.
[Link deleted - Z]
Just in case any of you have any spare dog shit you need posting. It may stop you getting at each others throats.
Sorry, but I have to delete that link.
Much as it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of people, the leaking of the members list is a breach of the Data Protection Act and therefore linking to it would put the site in breach of our terms and conditions.
Of course, I would never suggest that a spot of googling might find you the link…
You mean something like … “wikileaks and bnp member list”. We shoudl avoid posting a link to something like that ?
Okey dokey.
I’d imagine it would be something like that, D&C. Though of course I would never endorse such action.
Of course professional sh*t-stirrers/journalist’s would have published it with a hash.
Translation: would have compiled a mathematical checksum, that would make any tampering with the data (i.e. adding your bosses name) instantly detectable.
Ps. voting for your own comments is ethically unsound.
Proponents of political correctness can never rest easy, it seems.
Only today we learn that evil social workers in South Lanarkshire were found in possession of a photo-shop computer image of Gary Glitter , apparently trying to sneak a young child through airport customs.
The childs head can clearly be seen projecting from the top of Glitters shopping bag……..a shopping bag for christs sake, how f**king evil is that ?).
Needless to say meetings were hastily convened amongst the commissars in order to pore over the latest raft of centrally issued diktats.
It goes without saying the evil social workers were found bang to rights and summarily dismissed.
It remains to be seen if the evil offenders will be forced to endure a period of evaluation at a socialist re-programming centre ?
In the meantime drones in the ministry of truth busied themselves with re-writing history – no more than an urban myth is a likely defense, although the strawman is also being given serious consideration.
Altogether now…….”Baa Baa RAINBOW sheep……………”.
The nurse on that list is a mental health one.
I thought the nurse on the list was a district nurse?
There are a few nurses on the list. One specifically is a psychiatric nurse. Some are just listed as nurse.
I looked up a name on the nmc and it matched the address. I didn’t get past the A’s on that list though!